The verification was carried out by the Commission as part of:
from institution:
Cannon Marina Vladimirovna, deputy. Director for educational work
Churkin Dmitry Eduardovich, head. Service Department
Legene Lyudmila Nikolaevna. Educator
Vasilyeva S. G., Member of NooooOhi
According to the results of the inspection, the following is established (allocate the necessary):
1. Transition to the version of the site for visually impaired:
From the main page of the site (the right upper angle);
- from the main page of the site (other layout of the option);
Other ___________________.
2. The version of the site corresponds to the level of availability of information:
The minimum availability level (level A) - allows the disabled person to ensure accessibility to the Internet resource without information loss;
The level of full availability (level AA) - allows the visually impaired to provide access to all the structural elements of the Internet resource;
Information is not available for disabled vision.
There is no other information, but some functionality is not. For example, graphic images Not signed. The blind user will not be able to send a message in the section " feedback"because there is no alternative to graphic Captcha. You need to either add an audio code or put a textual task.
3. The site version is:
A separate page of the site with a different graphic design, a change in individual components to ensure the convenience of users;
- a separate page of the site, fully duplicating the main, with the exception of the color and font solution;
The inclusion of additional options in the special menu to increase or decrease the font and adjust the contrast level, but do not change the graphic content of the site (saved designer decoration, photos, other not text objects);
The inclusion of additional options in a special menu that increases or reducing the font and regulating the level of contrast, which provides an exception from the content of the site version of the site, not convenient for the perception of vision disabled (designer design, graphic objects);
Other ________________.
4. When moving to the site version, the graphic files presented in the Basic Version:
- persist unchanged;
Persist with an additional text description;
Do not persist.
5. The site version provides for a change in text size:
Minor up to 150%;
Other: You need to scroll through the text after changing the settings. In addition, when you press the news from the version for the visually impaired, it opens in the usual version. Repeated transition to the version for visually impaired so that the news is displayed larger. This should not be.
6. Working with the site is carried out:
Completely through the keyboard interface without any restrictions on the time of pressing the key;
Via the keyboard interface and using the mouse;
7. Compliance of the site version The basic principles of the organization of the available resource (on a scale from 1 to 10, where 10 is the maximum match):
Perception
(information and components are presented in the form, convenient for perception with disabilities in vision) 8;
Controllability (components and navigation are easily manageable) 9;
Cleanness (information and operations with the site are clear) 8;
Reliability (the site must be available for various browsers and user application programs) 10.
Comments and suggestions:
On the site you must add an alternative to Captcha. It can be an audio code or a simple text task.
The news title should be marked with a tag, not just a color. For each news, there must be a separate header of the smaller level compared to the general heading.
With the version for the visually impaired and other news pages should be opened in compliance with the settings for the visually impaired, but not like now. Now, to read the news by a large font, after opening it, you need to activate the link "version for the visually impaired" link.
Images are signed only in the "Available Wednesday" section, it would be good to sign them and on the other pages. Many unsigned images can be found in the "News" section.
In the Form fields, not all editing fields are signed. For example, the search field.
The entire button of the special version should be located on top, otherwise it is difficult to find a new visitor.
Conclusion of the Commission On compliance with the availability of persons with disabilities in vision to the official website of the professional educational institution (The site version meets the basic principles of the organization of the available resource / site version requires refinement According to the comments and suggestions (indicating the timing of changes) / site version does not comply with the basic principles of the organization of the available resource (indicating the causes and ways to solve the problem) site version requires refinement, execution time until 09/01/2016.
Members of the Commission (signature with decoding the surname):
From institution
Signature sennikova Marina Vladimirovna, deputy. Director for educational work
Signature Churkin Dmitry Eduardovich, head. Service Department
Signature of Legekova Lyudmila Nikolaevna, educator
from the public organization of persons with disabilities:
Signature Vasilyeva S. G., Member of NooooOhi
"EGS Group" conducts surveys of the accessibility of objects for MGN with the compilation of an act of examination, road maps and a detailed report on the necessary events in St. Petersburg and regions."EGS GROUP" Offers its customers to conduct a professional survey (audit of accessibility) of objects of any purpose and territory in accordance with the provisions of the SP 59.13330.2016, Federal Law No. 419-FZ and other regulatory documents.
Completed objects:
Since 2016, Specialists of LLC ESS-Engineering were inspected by the availability of buildings and services at different facilities related to the health, education, culture, and social sectors. Protection and transport.
Among the successfully completed objects can be allocated:
| An object | Hasional organization | Square, sq.m. |
| Airport Nadym. | - | |
| Airport Novy Urengoy | Federal Agency for Air Transport of the Russian Federation | - |
| Sevastopol home boarding house for elderly and disabled | Department of Social Protection of the population of Sevastopol | 9000 |
| Big Drama Theater named after G. Tovstonogov | Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation | 19000 |
| GBUZ City Clinical Oncology Dispensary | 55000 | |
| St. Petersburg GBUZ Children's Sanatorium Sunny | SPb Health Committee | 12500 |
| SPB GBUZ Consultative Diagnostic Center for Children | SPb Health Committee | 6500 |
| SPB GBUZ City Consultative Diagnostic Center for Children "Juvent" | SPb Health Committee | 4000 |
| SPB GBUZ Maternity House No. 13 for pregnant women and Horn with cardiovascular pathology | SPb Health Committee | 5000 |
| SPB GAUZ "Urban Polyclinic № 83" | SPb Health Committee | 3000 |
| SPB GBPOU " Medical College №2 " | SPb Health Committee | 15000 |
| GBOU Lyceum № 126 | SPb Committee | 22500 |
| SPB GBNOU St. Petersburg Music Lyceum | SPb Culture Committee | 2000 |
| and etc. |
Our advantages:
- Confirmed many years of experience these works on objects of various purposes;
- Membership in the SRO "Association of Stroyproekt designers, which gives the right to prepare projects for activities to ensure access to small groups of the population (clause 2.11);
- Estrase with the consolidated Ooi (the inspection of persons with disabilities);
- Performing a complete complex of pre-project work.
According to the results of the survey, the customer receives:
1. Passport accessibility object for small groups of the population;
2. Act examination availability (with separation by structural and functional zones);
3. Plan of events (road map) on the refurbishment of the facility in order to ensure the availability of the object and services for small groups of the population;
4. Act of agreed measures with the public inspection of persons with disabilities to ensure the availability of the object and services before overhaul;
5. Technical report About the inspection of accessibility.
The technical report on the results of the axle availability survey contains:
- Data analysis insturmentalnogo inspection accessibility to meet current requirements in respect of each structural-functional zones of the object;
- Photo scope of identified barriers and disorders with reference to existing regulations;
- Schemes of the developed ways of MGN movement from the entrance to the provision of services at the facility;
- List of versions for eliminating disorders found;
- The final conclusion on the level of accessibility of the axis.
Using an integrated approach, specialists carry out surveys on several structural and functional zones to be adapted for disabled people and other small groups of the population in order to further ensure the qualitative organization of the available environment at the facility.
Objectives achieved when conducting accessibility surveys:
- Obtaining an independent assessment of the availability of services for MGN of different categories of disability and institutions, the organization as a whole;
- Checking facilities to meet the requirements established in the Federal Law of 419-FZ, as well as other regulatory documents and updated SP 59.13330.2016;
- Obtaining recommendations on the necessary set of activities to bring the availability of institution and services, in it provided for all categories of MGN;
- Compilation and provision of authorities executive power accurate and objective information about the accessibility of facilities and services in the institution by means of the survey and certification of the facility;
- Updating information on the availability portal (axis accessibility card);
- Reduction of funds necessary for the formation and provision of an available environment in the institution;
- Avoiding possible administrative fines for non-compliance with the requirements of accessibility for MGN;
- Improving the image and demonstration of social responsibility commercial and public organizations.
Assessment of the accessibility object for each of the five categories of MGN:
- Disabled people moving on wheelchairs;
- With impaired view functions (blind and visually impaired);
- With impaired hearing functions (including deaf and weighted);
- With violation of the functions of the musculoskeletal system (upper and lower extremities);
- With violation of mental development functions.
LLC "Ex-Engineering" holds in St. Petersburg and regions of the Russian Federation:
- Survey of accessibility of health facilities
- Examination of the availability of rehabilitation and rehabilitation
- Examination of the availability of educational institutions
- Examination of the accessibility of cultural facilities
- Examination of the availability of transport infrastructure facilities
- Survey of accessibility of sports infrastructure
- Examination of the availability of public services
- Survey of accessibility of social services
- Examination of the availability of objects of the citywide infrastructure
The act of examination of the object is a document that can be drawn up on a variety of reasons, such as the upcoming transfer of rental, overhaul of the building, the transfer of an object under protection, deregistration, commissioning, purchase and sale, etc. Regardless of what the actual writing was caused, it necessarily records the state of the facility at the time of the survey, as well as the measures that may be taken to eliminate the defects found, damage and breakage.
Files
The act can be drawn in relation to objects entirely different function, including residential and non-residential buildings, movable and immovable property, etc.
Typically, the examination is visually in nature, but if necessary, some elements and parts of the object can be subjected to more thorough (and the laboratory) studies.
Who writes an act of surveying an object
The compilation of this act is engaged in a special independent commission, therefore, the first thing to be done to examine the facility is to appoint members of the Commission, as part of at least two people. These people should have the necessary skills to make a survey and evaluation of the required level, while, as far as possible to the work should involve experts from organizations professionally engaged in examining the state of these objects. In addition, the Commission is desirable to include a representative of the stakeholder.
The names of all members of the Commission should be entered into a document, indicating the selected chairman.
How to make an act: Highlights
There is no unified act of an act, so it can be in free form. In many ways, the form of the act is dictated by the goal of creating a document and its content. However, in order to object inspection act has gained legal force, with its design must adhere to certain standards.
Document must contain
- the date of compilation
- the name and address of the location of the object being checked,
- his condition (if necessary)
- goals that pursue a survey
- actions produced within its framework
- as well as the result.
If during the examination reveals any damage, breakage, defects (whether internal or external), they must also be reflected in the document (if possible, indicating the reasons that led to their appearance). In cases where competence is conducted on capital construction facilities, special attention should be paid to the supporting structures. In conclusion, the act must register recommendationsData by the Commission to eliminate the deployers detected.
If someone from the members of the commission disagree with information or conclusions entered into the act, it should write his argued, reasonable opinion in the same document by a separate paragraph.
If necessary, various documents confirming its content can be applied to the act (including photos, references to video, evidence of independent sources), which are made in the form of applications and are necessarily recorded in the act of act.
The act of examination of an object is made on paper not less than two, and, as a rule, even in several copies (depending on the number of stakeholders). It can be filled both by hand, and printed on a computer, but no matter what kind of design it will be selected, each copy of it must be certified by the originals of the Commission's member signatures. You do not need to make prints filled with seals.
Sample of the compilation of an act of examination of the object
At the beginning of the document fill it with its name, then the line below indicates localitywhich carried out a survey, as well as the date of drawing up an act.
Main part of Akt
The main part of the act is discovered by the description survey goals (overhaul, deregistration, lease, etc.), with reference to the basis (statement, order, order, judicial ruling, etc.), then here also fits composition of the Commission. Each member should be entered into an act with the name of the post and an indication of the organization that it represents.
The document includes the address of the object and detailed actions that were produced during its survey (preferably individual items). After the descriptive part of the act is drawn up, you need to summarize the procedure. If, during the inspection, there were no injuries, the subject is in a satisfactory condition and meets all required standards, in an act of quite limited fixing of this fact.
If deficiencies are found, they need to carefully describe and provide recommendations for their elimination.
In conclusion, all members of the Commission must put their signatures under the document.
1.4. Year of construction of the building _________, the last major repairs ______________
1.5. Date of upcoming planned repair work: current ________, capital _________
1.6. Organization name (institution), (full legal name - according to the Charter, Short Name) _____________________________________
1.7. Legal address of the organization (institution) ________________________
2. Characteristics of the organization's activities at the facility
Additional Information _____________________________________________________
3. Object availability status
3.1 Path following passenger transport (describe the route of movement using passenger transport)
Availability of adapted passenger transport to the object _______________________
3.2 Path to the object from the nearest passenger transport stop:
3.2.1 Distance to the object from the transport stop ________________ M
3.2.2 Movement time (on foot) ___________________ min
3.2.3 The presence of a pedestrian path dedicated from the roadway (yes, no),
3.2.4 Crossroads: Unregulated; adjustable, with sound signaling, timer; not
3.2.5 Information on the way to the object: acoustic, tactile, visual; not
3.2.6 Height differences on the way: yes, no (describe ______________________________________)
Their arrangement for people with disabilities in the wheelchair: yes, no (__________________________)
3.3 Organization of accessibility of an object for disabled - service form
|
Object availability option |
||
|
including disabled: |
||
|
moving on wheelchairs |
||
|
with impaired musculoskeletal system |
||
|
with violations of vision |
||
|
with hearing impairment |
||
|
with mental violations |
application
N on plan
Login (inputs) to the building
Information and communication system (on all zones)
The territory adjacent to the building (plot)
Login (inputs) to the building
The path (paths) of the movement inside the building (incl. Ways of evacuation)
The zone of the target building (target visits to the object)
Sanitary-hygienic premises
Information system at the facility (on all zones)
Ways to move to the object (from the transportation of transport)
All zones and plots
______________________________
* - one of the options (types of work) is indicated: it does not need; repair (current, capital); Individual solution with TSR; technical solutions Unable - Organization of an alternative service form
4.2. ______________________________________ period of work in the execution of _____________________________________________________ (specify name of the document: the program plan) 4.3 Expected results (as available) after the execution of works on adaptation ______________________________________________________ Evaluation of results of the program execution plan (as available) ______________ 4.4. To make a decision, it is required, no required (necessary to emphasize): 4.4.1. agreement on the Commission _________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________ (name of the Commission on the coordination of activities in the field of non-handicapping environments for persons with disabilities and other people with reduced mobility) 4.4.2. Coordination of work with supervisory authorities (in the field of design and construction, architecture, monument protection, other - indicate) ________________________________________________________________ 4.4.3. technical expertise; Development of design and estimate documentation; 4.4.4. coordination with a higher organization (owner of the object); 4.4.5. Coordination with public organizations of persons with disabilities _______ __________________; 4.4.6. There is another _____________________________________________________ conclusion of the authorized organization of object availability status (name of the document and the issuing organization, date), attached _____________________________________________________________ 4.7. Information may be posted (updated) on the subject of accessibility of the subject Russian Federation _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Site name, portal)
5. Special marks
Applications:
Survey results:
1. The territory adjacent to the object on __________ l.
2. Inputs (inputs) in the building on __________ l.
3. ways of movement in the building on __________ l.
4. Zones of target object to __________ l.
5. Sanitary and hygienic premises on __________ l.
6. Systems of information (and communications) at the facility on __________ l.
The results of the photo scope at the object __________________ to __________
Foot plans, Passport BTI _______________________ on __________
Other (including additional Information About ways to move to the object)
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Head working Group ___________________________________________ ______________ (Position, Name) (Signature) The members of the working group: ___________________________________________ ______________ (Position, Name) (Signature) ___________________________________________ ______________ (Position, Name) (Signature) In including representatives of public organizations of disabled persons ___________________________________________ ______________ (Position, Name) (Signature) ___________________________________________ ______________ (Position, Name) (Signature) representatives of the organizationlocated on the object ___________________________________________ ______________ (position, full name) (signature) _______________________________________________________________ ______________ (position, full name) Management solution agreed "____" ______________________ 20___ (Minutes N _____) by the Commission (name) _________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________